[PHNOM PENH POST]
NEWS that Laos is set to move ahead with construction of the
controversial Xayaburi Dam without further agreed consultation with the
rest of the Mekong region threatens to destroy hydropower cooperation.
But that doesn’t mean that Cambodia should follow a similarly
irresponsible route that threatens environmental and socio-economic
damage.
While Cambodia needs to raise electricity output as much
as the rest of the countries in the Mekong region, indeed perhaps more
so given its low level of rural electrification, to consider Vientiane’s
abuse of the system as carte blanche to move ahead regardless with its
own dams would be foolish.
Even if the likes of Vietnam,
probably to be a major benefactor from the likes of the Lower Sesan 2
Dam in Cambodia, exert pressure on Phnom Penh to move ahead, the
government needs to hold firm.
While the export of electricity to
Vietnam will bring in revenues to the country, and particularly the
likes of the Royal Group which is jointly developing the Lower Sesan 2
Dam, economically it is far from clear yet whether such projects make
economic – let along environmental – sense.
The key question that
researchers including the Mekong River Commission and International
Rivers continue to point out is that these dams potentially threaten
fish migratory patterns which would only harm stocks. With many rural
Cambodians gaining valuable protein from these fish, the trade-off for
much-needed electricity may not be a sensible one given that the
country’s food security will be tested. It means food will have to come
from other sources, most likely at greater cost.
So while
Cambodia desperately needs to catch up with electricity demand that is
growing at about 25 percent annually, the socio-economic trade-off in
the form of the livelihoods of fishermen and food is not necessarily a
valid one.
Cambodia should therefore try to do everything it can
to keep the regional framework of hydropower consultation while
sticking to strict environmental and socio-economic impact assessments
domestically. To so would be to help protect the basis of a significant
portion of socio-economic activity at home while hoping to minimise the
fallout from other hydropower projects abroad.
Certainly most
experts thus far say Cambodia has to think about more pressing issues
such as electricity transmission once it is produced before developing a
fully coherent dams policy. Rather than rush to follow ‘battery of
Southeast Asia’ hydropower model it would be far more prudent to do the
exact opposite of the Kingdom’s northern neighbour. In other words,
Cambodia should learn from Laos’ mistakes when it comes to building
dams, and unfortunately, Vientiane’s plan to move ahead with the
Xayaburi Dam looks to be among its most ill-advised.
No comments:
Post a Comment